Friday, July 14, 2006

Draft Letter to Grand Jury

Here is a draft letter of a response that Melendez wants to try and send to the Grand Jury. He fails to give a good reason why he and his crew decided to accept Sunset's bid after the deadline. He states that Sunset has "considerably more recycling experience" and this is one of the reasons they were selected. I still don't believe that this justifies paying a 100% more for our recycling services and I doubt that most of the residents of McFarland care that Sunset Waste has more experience in this field.

"Sunset had a financial incentive to maximixe diversion and recycling because it has invested millions of dollars". Well of course, that is why they are charging us twice as much. We are paying for their multi-million dollar investment.

I like the suggestion that he makes to the Grand Jury in the final paragraph, where he asks the Grand Jury to give him notice "before you issue a further letter of this type". Of course he doesn't want letters like these coming out, they demonstrate how he and his buddies Cantu and Santillano have failed. But these facts are bound to get out and it won't be long before the entire community is aware of it.

http://www.shafterchevron.com/resources/071406_LettertoGrandJury.pdf

3 Comments:

At 7/15/2006 10:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How did you get a letter that was a draft? If it was a draft, where did you find it, on someone's desk? Please let me know how you did get such a document. Maybe we can get more drafts from others in the commuity. would make for interesting reading. Is a draft a final version? Who is sending this draft? was is signed by someone?

 
At 7/16/2006 9:30 PM, Blogger Rafael Rodarte said...

We weren't being sneaky or anything like that. The letter was passed out at the last council meeting.

 
At 7/21/2006 8:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well I hope the Grand Jury will always be able to keep an eye and ear out and watch over the city.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home